Apple Proposes Fee Structure for External App Purchases Amidst Epic Dispute
Apple has submitted a new proposal in its ongoing legal battle with Epic Games, suggesting a fee structure for digital purchases made through external links not utilising Apple’s in-app purchase system. This follows a decision by a California district court in April 2025, which ruled against Apple’s ability to collect commissions on such purchases. Epic Games has countered Apple’s proposal, claiming it does not adhere to court guidance.
The dispute arises from a 2021 injunction in the Epic Games v. Apple case where the court found Apple’s compliance lacking. Although directed by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to evaluate “necessary costs,” Apple’s recent filing includes its proposed rates for external purchase fees.
Apple’s Proposed Fee Structure
Apple’s plan outlines different commission rates for purchases made outside the App Store:
- 15% for standard apps
- 10% for specific programme apps and subscription renewals
- 5% for Small Business Program apps
Despite proposing these rates, Apple’s internal analysis claims that implementing external purchase technology entails costs close to zero. The company argues that its fees are intended to recover a portion of the investment made in the tools and services provided to developers.
Epic Games’ Response
Epic Games has criticised Apple’s filing, highlighting that Apple acknowledges their “necessary costs” as defined by the Ninth Circuit would necessitate no charge for external purchases. Epic contends that the proposed fees surpass the court’s permissible fees and plans to present its opposition, supported by expert testimony, within the next two months.
The legal confrontation between Apple and Epic continues as both parties navigate the intricacies of app store economics and digital purchase regulations. The case remains subject to further judicial review, with the involvement of the Supreme Court on the horizon.
Reporting based on coverage first published by theverge.com.